|
|
CPA Disbarred for Failure to Exercise Due Diligence and Compliance Problems (Tax News On The Tenth)
By Timothy M. Hughes 2010-07-10
The IRS Washington headquarters announced on July 6, 2010 that the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) had prevailed in an agency appeal involving issues which include the due diligence responsibilities of a CPA under the Rules of Practice before the IRS (Circular 230). The May 28th decision of the Treasury Appellate Authority has upheld the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) disbarment of CPA Tim W. Kaskey finding, among other things, that Kaskey failed to exercise due diligence in preparing tax returns for a corporation and its husband and wife shareholders.
OPR Director Karen L. Hawkins said of the case “this is yet another decision highlighting that practitioners have a duty to the system as well as to their clients. Practitioners who do not take this duty seriously can expect to be held accountable,” Kaskey is a CPA and tax advisor who also prepared individual and corporate tax returns.
OPR alleged that Kaskey failed to exercise due diligence under Circular 230, section 10.22 when he failed to determine the correctness of the representations he made to the IRS on the tax returns of a corporation and its married shareholders. OPR also alleged that Kaskey’s misconduct included a failure to comply with the requirement to advise clients of potential penalties and any opportunities to avoid such penalties by disclosure contained in Circular 230, section 10.34(c)
When Kaskey failed to respond, or appear, at the administrative proceeding, the ALJ deemed the allegations against Kaskey admitted and entered a default judgment for disbarment. Kaskey appealed. On review, the Treasury Appellate Authority agreed that disbarment was proper. Kaskey defended against the due diligence allegations by arguing that his clients had misrepresented their income to him. The Treasury Appellate Authority observed that there was “a great deal of evidence reflecting the lack of due diligence by [Kaskey] in the preparation of these returns…[and that] “it was inconceivable that [the individual taxpayers] could pay their living expenses based on the income reported on their returns.”
“Practitioners who think OPR is not serious about due diligence should take heed,” added OPR Director Hawkins. “Practitioners may not ignore the implications of information already known, and must make reasonable inquiries if the information furnished by a client appears to be incorrect, inconsistent, or incomplete.”
If you would like more details about helping your clients in IRS or IDOR collection matters, please do not hesitate to call our office. Our office has been successful in helping taxpayers with IRS collection problems for over 19 years. Please call our office and ask for Brittany at (847) 705-7555 to talk to one of our tax attorneys and find out how we can help your client in front of IRS collections.
|
Our lawyers are ready to fight the 941 Tax for you. Click here to learn more on fighting the 941 tax or
CALL 866-913-9778
right now!
- CPA Disbarred for Failure to Exercise Due Diligence and Compliance Problems
view newsletter
- Tax type: 941. Approximate liability: $45,000 personal liability. OUR RESULT: $0.00 – complete abatement.
Read more.
- Tax type: 1040. Approximate liability: $525,000. OUR RESULT: $5,000 Offer in Compromise accepted.
Read more.
- Tax type: 1040. Approximate liability: $20,000. OUR RESULT: $250 Offer in Compromise accepted.
Read more.
|
